Posted on Leave a comment

Kicking Tires in Pierre

Nobody thinks South Dakota is perfect, but most of us would agree it seems to get along pretty well from day to day. Which makes me wonder what our legislators do in Pierre. Each year, 105 of our best and brightest gather for the session. Most of them are conscientious sorts so they work at least 10 hours a day, if you count the after-hours schmoozing. That’s 42,000 woman/man hours doing what? Is our system of laws really so dilapidated it needs that much tweaking? If South Dakota was a car and required almost two months in the shop every year, we’d surely trade it off.

Be that as it may, our lawgivers can surely spare a few hours to consider these suggestions.

AN ACT TO ENSURE THE HAPPINESS OF FOUR-WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLES

I was noodling through the mall parking lot one day when I happened upon an entire row of big, square, ugly vehicles. You know the breed: ponderous sport utilities and crew cab pickups you need a stepladder to enter, all with beefy tires and four-wheel drive. I was struck by the fact that there wasn’t a speck of mud or dust on any of them. They were all dripping chrome and showroom shiny. I suspect the closest they ever got to rugged terrain was the speed bumps at HyVee.

Not long afterward I saw a picture in the Sioux Falls Argus Leader of one such vehicle up to its door handles in the waters of Skunk Creek. It was found early in the morning, abandoned, and it’s not hard to imagine how it got there. At least two guys. Late. Testosterone and alcohol-fueled bravado/stupidity. Wee-haw. Vroom vroom. I’ve got four-wheel drive. Bet I can make it across. Vroom vroom. Rrrrrr. Clunk. Click. Click. Let’s get out of here before somebody administers a Breathalyzer test.

We can all agree these guys are most likely morons, but think of the favor they did for their vehicle. Most 4X4s these days are forced to live out their lives looking like Tarzan and driving like Jane, never busting through snowdrifts or exploring forests primeval like they were promised when they rolled off the assembly line. This act would require every SUV and vanity truck owner to produce evidence showing they at least drove through a mud puddle in the past year before their vehicle’s license could be renewed. We must end the abuse of these machines before they turn on us and crush us like an old car at a monster truck rally.

AN ACT TO REQUIRE THE MANUAL OPENING OF CERTAIN DOORS

While waiting outside my town’s wellness center one afternoon, I saw quite a few people enter the building. I was astonished by the number of them, able-bodied one and all, most wearing athletic gear and presumably there to exercise, who pressed the button meant to open the door for handicapped people. Young. Old. Male. Female. All made use of the button. Pushing a door open is just too exhausting, apparently.

Such behavior should be discouraged. By this act, all able-bodied individuals will be required to open their own doors. Those who don’t will get a temporary tattoo on the forehead that reads, “Lazy.” A week of being so branded seems about right.

If this law works out, follow-up legislation may mandate a “Selfish” tattoo for people who use two parking spaces for one car, and “Pigheaded” for those who get in the express checkout line with more than 10 items and refuse to move, knowing the clerk will give in to get the line moving. Citizens will be encouraged to submit their own ideas; soon there will be a dozen, a hundred, a thousand ways to get tattooed. No longer will we have to suffer in silence. Each of our pet peeves will be elevated to the status of law. Between that and everyone continuously informing on everyone else, the world will be a much happier place.

Some might argue that these penalties run afoul of the Constitution’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Not to worry. Something is “unusual” only if it doesn’t happen very often. Once it starts happening all the time then it becomes “usual.” Locking people in a room made of iron bars must have seemed pretty curious at some point in history. Now it’s normal. Once we have tattooed people walking around here, there and everywhere we won’t think twice about it.

AN ACT TO ENSURE FULL DISCLOSURE IN BAKED GOODS

Each and every year the state of South Dakota produces approximately 470 pounds of zucchini for every man, woman and child. This unwelcome bounty is a big problem. Lovers of this foul fruit of the vine, which I most assuredly am not, can only eat so much of it fried, baked or sautÈed. This causes them to seek out ways to use it in other recipes. Muffins. Bread. Chocolate cake — an abomination that cries out to the heavens for redress. Each fall I live in fear that I may accidentally ingest some.

This act would make it a felony to use zucchini in baked goods and not inform potential eaters of same. The prison term would be doubled for anyone who encourages consumption of a zucchini-tainted concoction by uttering, “Try some! You’ll never even taste it!” or the equivalent.

Since I’ve already done the heavy lifting by coming up with the Big Ideas, working out the details of these laws should only take a few hours. I have no idea what our legislators will do with the rest of their time. Perhaps a good book.

Editor’s Note: This column is revised from the January/February 2008 issue of South Dakota Magazine. To order a copy or to subscribe, call (800) 456-5117.

Posted on Leave a comment

Pat Adam: Classy’s the Word

Friends and family will bury Pat Mickelson Adam on Tuesday. It will be a relatively quiet service — quite unlike the overwhelming grief bestowed across the state when her brother George died in 1993 in the tragic plane crash that also killed seven other state leaders. But Pat, like her brother the governor, also deeply loved South Dakota. She made this a better place through family commitment, community service and a decade as Secretary of the South Dakota State Senate. When she retired from the senate in 2006, Senator Lee Schoenbeck was President Pro Temp. He took the occasion to make these remarks. They are as pertinent today as when he delivered them 10 years ago.

By State Rep. Lee Schoenbeck

Those who have served in senate leadership these past 11 years, especially know and understand just how important Pat Adam has been to this institution. We appreciate the simple things: whispered advice to avert embarrassment or problems, the heads up foresight about impending issues, the ability to make leaders look like they can”see around corners.”

But some times we forget just what a special person serves amongst us. Pat Adam, your life is woven through the history and politics of our state, like no other person alive here in Pierre today. Your father served with distinction in the legislature, as Attorney General, and as Governor. Your brother’s service followed his father as Speaker and as Governor. Your sorrow in the loss of your brother was felt by the entire state.

Pat Adam, your father and your brother were accomplished South Dakotan public servants, but the male members of the Mickelson clan fell short when compared to their fairer member before us — in one very special way. They only served in the House. The Senate has been your playground!

In a place often plagued with discord and discontent, you have brought order, friendship, kindness — and an award winning smile. When your steady hand leaves the rostrum, an important piece of our history leaves this body. A valued friend leaves this institution.

We can’t fault you wanting to be with a husband that we’ve all come to know and respect from his days as a lobbyist and public servant. We can’t fault you for wanting to see more of three children that have already begun to make their mark on our state’s landscape. And we surely can’t fault a 39 year old lady that wants to enjoy her grandchildren — but you will be missed. You are a classy lady.

Posted on Leave a comment

Under the Capitol Dome

The state Capitol in Pierre on a cold winter’s afternoon creates a quiet atmosphere contrary to the buzz of activity within its halls.

I had promised myself that if I won election to the state Senate, at least once every day during the legislative session, I would climb the grand staircase to the third floor of the state Capitol. Made of white Vermont marble, it glows and shimmers as if made of lead crystal. Almost as inspiring as the Milky Way, it is a staircase meant for governors, for kings, for democrats. One must breathe in and bow in such grandeur, in reverence to the grand experiment of democracy, in gratitude for the opportunity to be here.

Once up the staircase, take a right or a left, walk to the south, and you overlook the rotunda. It is 95 feet from the floor to the vaulted dome. I crane my neck, peering as deeply as I can into the arch above. Does it represent the curvature of the Earth, I wonder? Is it the heavens? Or is it the domed sky capturing the faint song of a Dakota brave to the eagle above?

The Capitol building is as much cathedral as capitol, a mountainous presence above the prairie. Early one Saturday morning in February, the moon floated across the sky like an inflated balloon, looking as if it might meld into the lighted dome of the Capitol. Then the moon, tethered to its mother Earth, sank behind the Missouri River hills, the sun rose and day began.

The capitols of Montana and South Dakota are twins. Montana and South Dakota were both admitted to the Union in 1889. Montana designed its capitol first. South Dakota Gov. Samuel Elrod, a noted skinflint, or perhaps a practical South Dakotan, didn’t want to waste good money on design. He paid the Montana governor $20 for their plans.

Walk into our Capitol during the legislative session, and you enter a dynamo. The building throbs with energy, a power plant with the hum of a turbine at your feet, the strength of a South Dakota thunderstorm. As a legislator, you walk within the storm, often through its eye. You brace yourself against its ferocity and look for the lightning bolt.

I love to stand on the balcony outside the Senate Chambers, near the marble railings overlooking the rotunda. It is sufficiently high to induce vertigo. People below scurry like New York taxicabs, up and down, in and out. Surely, I thought, someone has put this to music. A lobbyist told me she used to pose herself here, like a watchtower. From this perspective, she could see who was walking below and calculate her strategy.

Watching scurrying mortals from the third floor balcony is mesmerizing, but more inspiring is to gaze at the immortals above, Greek goddesses gazing down from murals in the dome — Minerva, the goddess of wisdom and victory, Venus at play with Cupid, Ceres, and Europa, grasping a bull by its horns.

Greek goddess Minerva keeps watch on legislators below. She is one of several mythic figures depicted on murals throughout the Capitol dome.

In Greek mythology, Minerva carries an owl on her shoulder. But she also breathed life into Pandora, who unleashed the Miseries of Scolding, Deceit, Despair, Accusation, Lies, Envy, Distrust, Scheming, Drudgery and Gossip. “Here?” I thought.

The beautiful mortal, Europa, is mounting Zeus, a god disguised as a bull. Seduced by his soft eyes, she will be kidnapped and carried across the seas.

Cupid swirls in the gown of Venus, the goddess of beauty. “Cupid slinging arrows in this building?” I wondered. Unseen is the spirit of Strife, who threw the apple of discord into a wedding party, declaring, “The fairest shall pick it up.” Three ravishing goddesses, Hera, Venus, and Minerva dove for the apple, and it was from this seed that the Trojan War was born.

Ceres stands alone by a cornstalk. It is she who lent her chariot to man and taught him to sow and reap. But ironically, Ceres’ daughter Persephone was carried off to Hades by a dark chariot drawn by black horses. With Persephone pulled into the darkness below, the Earth grieves, and Ceres becomes an old gray woman. Winter falls, and mortals await Persephone’s return in the spring, when the Earth again will bloom.

“Ah,” I thought, feeling intensely mortal and vulnerable, “which goddess will have this day?”

I took a drink from the marble fountain, and walked through the swinging doors into the Senate Chamber. Woven into the carpet is the state seal with its plowman, mines, cattle, commerce, the Black Hills, the Missouri River. I could almost feel my grandmother’s presence, a homesteader where the Cheyenne River meets the Missouri 40 miles up. I walk to my desk in a room of cherry wood, African mahogany and scagliola columns, where delicious paintings speak the dreams of our ancestors, where amber stained glass bathes the chambers in the light of early fall. It is regal, rich, somber, and important.

Students and other constituents from around the state travel to Pierre during the legislative session to watch and learn. They observe proceedings from balconies in the Senate and House.

My greatest surprise was a good surprise. Legislators, Republican and Democrat, are comrades. There are 35 of us in the Senate, twice that in the House. We share a responsibility, a sense of mission, a duty. Most of us are separated from home, from children and spouses. During the session, each camps in a motel or hotel room. Each is there to make a difference. For January, February and part of March, life barely exists outside the legislature.

We do battle, experience victory, suffer wounds. It is a boot camp of sorts. But through it all, as we gather in committee hearings, debate in our caucuses and argue on the floor, there is a touching of hands, an acknowledgement in the voice that says “Good morning, senator,” a shared deference, a respect for the person and the position. It is not perfect, and not shared equally by all. But I have not met one former legislator who does not consider having served in the legislature as fundamental to who they are. It is a mark, a fraternity.

A cynic told me the day I left for my first session, “Don’t forget, Tom. Ninety-nine percent of the people don’t know and don’t care what you do in Pierre.” Unnecessarily harsh, I felt, but I discovered that even if he was right, the 1 percent who do care, care a great deal.

Pages help the legislative process run smoothly. They are selected from high schools across South Dakota.

“I love the process,” is a common refrain among legislators. Bills start as ideas, but harden to steel, fired by the legislative process. Propose a bill, and if it is a good one, like a piece of clay it is molded and shaped by many hands. Even an argument or bill lost can move the ball, can in some way shape tomorrow’s bill. I look to the panels of bearded legislators before me, I look to lawmakers unlike me, I look to lobbyists around me for perspective, for understanding. And then, somehow, through this great sifting and contemplative process, I vote, we vote. It is a process that boils down all arguments, bulging notebooks and stuffed files into one of two words: Yea, or Nay.

Another surprise. I had expected, had been told that there would be someone in leadership, in the administration, among constituents who would tell me how they expected me to vote. Not true, I discovered. But what you are expected to do is to formulate opinions that are grounded and sound, that have depth, that are representative of who you are. They may be dramatically different than people want. But if you treat serious matters seriously and thoughtfully, if you know and tell the truth to the best of your ability, you are granted the opportunity to do what you feel you have to do. And it is not possible to hide.

I had not suspected what happened to a freshman senator on his first speech on the floor. Standing amidst the roll top desks under the amber and brown stained glass of the Senate floor is not only humbling. It is frightening. When I stood to present my first bill, I gasped, then grasped for my microphone. I felt as if I was falling down a flight of stairs. But somehow I heard myself still talking, my presentation lasting all of 60 seconds or so. I sat down and did my best not to let anyone see the blood escaping my ears, mouth or nose. The bill was a lay-up, and was given to me because it was. But to my astonishment, I heard the majority leader ask the president of the Senate for permission to ask Sen. Dempster a question about his bill. As is protocol, the presiding officer, the lieutenant governor, turned to me and said, “Senator Dempster, do you wish to respond to the senator’s question?”

“What?” I thought everybody knew this was my first bill. I rose again, grasped the microphone and did my best to answer the question. Then there was another, and another, the questions more direct, my answers weaker and paler. My legislative career was doomed. Mercifully, the vote was called, the roll call taken, and the bill passed. Only then did I hear Sen. Bogue welcome me to the Senate floor, followed by smiles and applause of every colleague. Sen. Sam Nachtigal walked over and slipped me a note. “Good job,” it said, “but your zipper was down.”

My first real bill was intensely instructive. The merits were so clear. I was surprised by the heated debate on the Senate floor, and a little offended when a member of my party rose to call it the “stupidest bill of this session.” But that didn’t bother me because it was just one vote. It was only when heavies in the back of the room stood and spoke against my bill that I realized I was dying. Debate ended and the votes were taken, each nay deepening my color and agony. When the dismal result was announced, Sen. Richard Kelly, seated in front of me, turned and told me to “move for a reconsideration.”

When the bill came up the next day, the battle was on again. But I had asked for help, and I got it. I will never forget the assistant majority leader running up to me. “Give the rebuttal, make it short,” he said. “I’ll call the question.” We passed the bill, and later in the session it passed the House and was signed into law.

The Capitol grounds includes several memorials, including this one to veterans.

Like all specialized work, the legislature has its own language and meaning. Bills get “hog housed,” and I learned that “no recommendation” from a committee is better than having a bill “sent to the 41st day.” Committee action can be gutted with a “smoke-out.” There is a certain window when you can submit legislation, and a specific number of bills one can sponsor as the window begins to close. Some insurance bills are filled with such complicated language that even if you hold them to a mirror and read them backwards, it doesn’t help. Knowledge is king in this world, but so too is a word of encouragement, a thank you and a handshake.

Whether farmer, lawyer, teacher, rancher, doctor or stockbroker, for all legislators the pilgrimage to Pierre can be long, sometimes treacherous. To get to the middle of the state we drive through cities, farmsteads, small towns, interstates, two-lane highways. There is ritual in traveling great distances, in traversing the state on Sunday and back again on Friday or Saturday. There is satisfaction in hearing the crack of the gavel and the call that “the Senate will come to order” on Monday, and sometimes even better is the crack and the order to adjourn on Friday.

Pierre is a place apart, and the journey to it an equalizer. When winter storms move in on Friday, they stir a sense of urgency. Time to bare yourself to an unfriendly onslaught of frigid air, winds that singe like glistening knives. The highways will be treacherous, and perhaps still on Sunday when it’s time to turn around and drive back. On Sunday night, stories of the road are shared. There is communion here, for all have supped the same wine. Other lawmakers become brethren, and seatmates like family.

When the legislature is not in session, the Senate and House chambers are silent, the calm of an ocean at rest. Lights are dimmed, the floor cordoned off. It is a melancholy, silenced stadium, an unlighted stage. I miss the sergeant at arms, look for the lights to fire, want to feel the blood coursing through the marble banisters. I can taste the best bagels in the world from the cafe downstairs, see the lobbyists in their huddles, wonder about the governor’s men scouting below.

I close my eyes and hear the roll call. “Abdullah, aye, Albers, aye, Apa, nay.” My family’s Rotary exchange student from Italy, Stefie Zanet, was a Senate page, and for months after the session, she sang the roll call vote, senator after senator, name after name. Some votes fall like an easy rain. Others are tough, filling the chamber as if each vote is rung by the somber tone of a cathedral’s bell, deep and final. I remember one such vote late in the session. My seatmate, Jay Duenwald, his eyes expressive as a poet’s, nodded. “This sucker’s gonna pass, Tom,” he said. “The sucker’s gonna pass.”

Editorís Note: This story is revised from the January/February 2004 issue of South Dakota Magazine. To order a copy or to subscribe, call (800) 456-5117.

Posted on Leave a comment

Raising Legislator Pay

Four bills increasing South Dakota’s legislators’ compensation — count ’em, four! HB 1145, HB 1149, HB 1150, and SB 170 — are sailing through the Legislature. The most direct, SB 170, would raise legislators’ annual pay from $6,000 to $10,000.

Let me be clear: I support raising legislator pay. Our legislators work hard for some of the lowest legislator pay in the nation. They sacrifice family and work time to do thankless work in the glare of public scrutiny. Those conditions make legislative candidates scarce. Higher pay will help address that candidate shortage.

Republican Rep. Jim Bolin has made arguments like that to defend two of these bills. I make arguments like that to advocate higher teacher pay. The logical connection between our arguments seems obvious. Alas, that logical connection seems to escape our legislators, who have proposed no legislation this session to address South Dakota’s teacher shortage.

How do we fix that cognitive disconnect? Hmm … if legislators can’t look at teacher pay the way they look at their own checks, maybe they’ll get it if we look at legislator pay the way legislators look at teacher pay. Here are some legislative pay-raise counterplans I would expect from our Republican legislators:

  1. Local Control: Let citizens in each district set salaries for their legislators. Set out tip jars at crackerbarrels … but subject distribution of those tips to local referendum.
  2. Merit Pay: Appropriate money to raise the salaries of 21 out of the 105 legislators. Give the raises to the legislators who perform best, as determined by (a) number of bills enacted, (b) number of votes their bills receive, and (c) number of proponents who testify in committee for their bills. Let the Governor break any ties.
  3. Bang for the Buck: We can’t just throw money at legislators. We have to get something for our investment. Raise their pay, but lengthen the session by a month.
  4. Summer Study: Why are we rushing to raise legislator pay? How do we even know that higher pay attracts more workers? Let’s first convene a Blue Ribbon Task Force to study the Legislature and maybe reinvent basic labor economics.
  5. Training Wage: Fund raises for some legislators by cutting the pay for legislators under the age of 30. Young legislators don’t bring as much talent, do as much work, or sacrifice as much time as older legislators.

(Oops–sorry about #5: I mixed up how Republicans treat teachers with how they treat children. Easy mistake.)

Legislators, if you finally catch my goose-gander drift, permit me to propose an amendment to the legislative pay raise that I really would support. Let’s index legislator pay to teacher pay. If South Dakota teachers rank 51st for pay, you rank 51st for pay. If you legislators get South Dakota teachers up to 50th or 49th (do I hear 34th?), your pay goes up the same.

Legislator pay and teacher pay — connect the two, and we might really start solving some problems.

Update: Between the drafting and the publication of this column, the Senate rejected Senate Bill 170, the $4,000 pay raise. It looks like our senators are rediscovering their political consistency and leaving both teachers and legislators in the pay cellar.

Editor’s Note: Cory Heidelberger is our political columnist from the left. For a conservative perspective on politics, please look for columns by Dr. Ken Blanchard on this site.

Cory Allen Heidelberger writes the Madville Times political blog. He grew up on the shores of Lake Herman, near Madison. He studied math and history at South Dakota State University and information systems at Dakota State University. Heidelberger lives, writes and bikes in Aberdeen.

Posted on Leave a comment

Putting Money Where Our Needs Are

Nine percent of our neighbors are American Indians. That’s about 76,000 out of 845,000 South Dakotans. Lakota, Nakota and Dakota people make up 15.6 percent of our K-12 student population, almost 22,000 school-age kids out of about 141,000 total. That’s a lot of residents and a lot of kids belonging to separate sovereign nations within our state borders.

Three actions by our Legislature this session suggest South Dakota isn’t prioritizing the needs of the largest minority population in the state.

The Board of Regents studied the underrepresentation of American Indians on our public university campuses last year and came up with several proposals for addressing the unique challenges students face in navigating the very different worlds of reservation and university. Among the Regents’ proposals was House Bill 1020, a plan to hire one full-time American Indian education outreach specialist to help tribal students and families across the state with the university admission process. That position would have cost $65,000. House Appropriations said no.

Later in the session, Senate Bill 127 proposed spending $500,000 on Teach for America, a Peace Corps-like program that currently places over 60 young teachers in South Dakota schools that have a hard time recruiting regular teachers. Teach for America has aimed at providing teachers for half of South Dakota’s American Indian student population and two-thirds of that population on the reservations by 2015. Secretary of Education Melody Schopp testified at the beginning of the Legislative session that Teach for America fills a gap in American Indian education that the state can’t fill any other way.

The Senate twice failed to get the two-thirds vote necessary to pass SB 127. The Joint Appropriations Committee then refused to renew last year’s state commitment of $250,000 to Teach for America, leaving the program with no state support for its mission to educate American Indians.

The Legislature did provide funding for the Department of Tribal Relations. The Fiscal Year 2015 state budget that passed last week spends $619,017 on those relations. That’s 0.015 percent of the $4.259-billion state budget.

The Department of Tribal Relations gets five full-time positions to do its work. That’s 0.036 percent of the state’s 13,947 full-time-equivalent workforce in FY 2015.

For perspective, South Dakota has about 73,000 veterans, a slightly smaller segment of our population than American Indians. The FY 2015 budget spends $1.66 million on veterans’ benefits and services, including 67 full-time veterans service officer positions. (Six of those positions are tribal VSOs.)

By no means would I suggest the state should not dedicate resources to helping veterans with their unique problems. And by no means would I suggest that American Indians get no benefit from our general spending on schools, roads, and other services. But I would suggest that educating and improving relations with American Indians, the largest minority in our schools and our communities, warrants more dedicated budgetary effort … an effort the 2014 Legislature seemed unwilling to make.

Editor’s Note: Cory Heidelberger is our political columnist from the left. For a right-wing perspective on politics, please look for columns by Dr. Ken Blanchard on this site.

Cory Allen Heidelberger writes the Madville Times political blog. He grew up on the shores of Lake Herman. He studied math and history at SDSU and information systems at DSU, and has taught math, English, speech, and French at high schools East and West River.

Posted on Leave a comment

Selectively Desperate

By Cory Allen Heidelberger

In my last column I got hot and bothered about Senate Bills 67 and 128, bills that sought to protect discrimination against homosexuals as religious free expression. Neither bill has survived, and I’m hoping House State Affairs rejects a similar bill this afternoon (February 19).

While the Legislature is showing some good sense in foiling the proposals of its less temperate members, I’m hearing some cognitive dissonance on how the values of some South Dakotans stack up against our desire for economic development.

First, consider the gay-discrimination bills. In Senate Judiciary testimony on February 18, Sen. Mark Kirkeby (R-35/Rapid City) asked if SB 128 would allow a religious pharmacist in a small, one-pharmacy town to refuse to fill a prescription for a gay customer. SB 128 advocate Mark Chase said he didn’t think SB 128 would apply to pharmacies and restaurants. SB 128 refers pretty clearly to “private businesses,” and pharmacies and restaurants are private businesses. One can conclude, then, that backers of SB 128 were encouraging pharmacists and other South Dakota businesspeople to stop doing business with gay customers.

Business owners, help me out here: how many of you doing business on Main Street Yankton, Sisseton or Lemmon can tell one in 23 of your customers to take a hike? I could be wrong, but I’m willing to speculate that South Dakota pharmacists and bakers with too many customers are few and far between.

I didn’t hear economic development discussed much among legislators on SB 128 and similar anti-gay bills. But economic development was a primary reason House State Affairs killed HB 1176 today (February 19). Rep. Stace Nelson (R-19/Fulton) brought his bill to block South Dakota’s use of the EB-5 visa investment program. Rep. Nelson presented documents suggesting EB-5 investment poses national security risks by placing U.S. economic assets under Chinese Communist control. Rep. Bernie Hunhoff (D-18/Yankton) responded that not using EB-5 would put South Dakota at a disadvantage to every other state that uses EB-5 for economic development, and down went HB 1176. Mention economic development, and other concerns disappear.

We find a similar attitude down the road from Pierre in Winner. Mayor Jess Keesis says the Keystone XL pipeline will be great for his town. Mayor Keesis laments that Winner’s strip clubs have had to shut down. Keesis says TransCanada’s planned nearby workers’ camp will bring business back to town, at least for a couple years. Never mind the predictable man-camp crime, wear on roads, and increased energy costs Keystone XL will bring; Keesis says South Dakotans can’t pass up any economic development opportunity:

Out here on the prairie, you know, we’re a tough people …. We deal with drought and 8-foot blizzards and all kinds of stuff all the time, so anytime we can get something like this to give us a shot, it’s a good thing. [quoted in Rob Hotakainen, “American Indians Versus the Pipeline,” Governing, 2014.02.18].

In one breath, South Dakotans are tough! In the next, we’re too weak to oppose any chance to make a buck, no matter how risky. That’s cognitive dissonance.

The conservative proponents of anti-gay legislation in South Dakota seem oblivious to the economic consequences of discrimination. Yet on other issues, South Dakota politicians of many stripes reach a little too quickly for “economic development” as the justification for their actions without considering the full impact of programs and projects on South Dakota’s interests.

Editor’s Note: Cory Heidelberger is our political columnist from the left. For a right-wing perspective on politics, please look for columns by Dr. Ken Blanchard on this site.

Cory Allen Heidelberger writes the Madville Times political blog. He grew up on the shores of Lake Herman. He studied math and history at SDSU and information systems at DSU, and has taught math, English, speech, and French at high schools East and West River.

Posted on Leave a comment

Anti-Civil Rights Bills Bad for Business

I’ve written previously on these pages that the South Dakota Legislature doesn’t do a great job of building South Dakota’s brand with a broader audience. The 2014 Legislature continues its poor performance, making South Dakota sound like a haven for folks who want to erase the Civil Rights Act.

First this session came Senate Bill 67, a bill intended to protect religious bakers from the terror of having to make wedding cakes for homosexuals. As worded, SB 67 would have permitted shopkeepers, lawyers and perhaps public officials to deny services to any married couple whose union somehow didn’t square with their religious beliefs. Got divorced and remarried? Sorry, I’m an old-school Catholic, and divorce is a sin. You’re a white woman, and you married a Lakota man? Sorry, St. Paul tells me no miscegenation, so you can’t stay in my motel. Yeesh!

After some public outcry, prime sponsor Sen. Ernie Otten withdrew SB 67, not because he saw the light of equality, but because he concluded that the discrimination he craves is already legal.

Worse, some of his conservative colleagues quickly followed up with Senate Bill 128, which goes beyond the wedding-cake homophobia of SB 67 to allow bosses to fire employees because of their sexual orientation, to nullify federal civil rights laws, and to impose legislative restraint on the judicial branch.

Responding to criticism from a young constituent at a Rapid City cracker barrel on Feb. 1, SB 128 author Sen. Phil Jensen farcically called his bill an “anti-bullying free speech bill.” The only free speech SB 128 protects is the speech of bullying businesses that want to hang signs on the door reading “Straights Only.”

Technically, South Dakota law already gives Senators Jensen and Otten the right to discriminate against homosexuals as their bills advocate. We already ban same-sex marriages. Our public accommodations law does not include sexual orientation as a protected class. That law does ban sex discrimination, and the federal government does interpret sexual orientation as an expression of sex.

But South Dakota’s law and these proposals from our legislators make our state look bad. SB 128 has drawn negative out-state attention. Some Republican legislators are backing away from this civil rights black eye. U.S. Senate candidate Rick Weiland calls SB 128 a return to Jim Crow. Independent candidate Larry Pressler has warned that SB 128’s retrograde attitude toward civil rights could cost South Dakota jobs and Ellsworth Air Force Base (why would Uncle Sam keep a military installation in a place where its soldiers’ gay spouses couldn’t get jobs?).

Senators Otten and Jensen can swing their religious fists all they want. But their rights end when their Bible-clutching fists start hitting other people’s noses. SB 67 sought and SB 128 seeks to drive certain people out of South Dakota businesses. Unfortunately, such proposals will drive even more people away, and drive some South Dakotans out of business.

Editor’s Note: Cory Heidelberger is our political columnist from the left. For a right-wing perspective on politics, please look for columns by Dr. Ken Blanchard on this site.

Cory Allen Heidelberger writes the Madville Times political blog. He grew up on the shores of Lake Herman. He studied math and history at SDSU and information systems at DSU, and has taught math, English, speech, and French at high schools East and West River.

Posted on Leave a comment

Can We Shoot for Second-Worst?

I have made this argument before. Sandy-eared ostriches in the Legislature require that I make it again, and again….

The South Dakota Legislature this week considered a resolution–not a practical, policy-changing bill, mind you, just a resolution–that acknowledges a shortage of teachers in South Dakota due in part to low teacher pay. HCR 1002 passed the House over some objection from Republicans with poor reading comprehension. No Senators spoke against the resolution, but the Senate killed it Tuesday 15‚Ä’19.

Evidently some problems are too brutal for a majority of Senators to talk about, let alone solve.

The teacher shortage resolution didn’t explicitly call for raising teacher pay, but it should have. Recent data show South Dakota is last, last, last in teacher pay, stunningly last, 30 percent below the national average, 10 percent below 48th-ranked Oklahoma, and six percent below 49th-ranked Mississippi. According to 2013 Quarter 3 data, South Dakota’s cost of living is only 0.5 percent below the national average.

HCR 1002 mentioned the drop in young people choosing to work in education in South Dakota. Who can blame them? Our perennially low teacher wages make it harder for South Dakota graduates to deal with another ongoing problem, our high rates of student debt. A new report confirms reports from 2010, 2011, and 2012: South Dakota college graduates lead the nation in student debt, with 78 percent of our graduates carrying student loans. Their average debt is “only” $25,121, a middling amount compared to other states. But for those hardy young souls who go into teaching, why would they pass up the chance to move one state in any direction and pay off their student loans much faster with an average $8,000 to $18,000 pay hike?

Why won’t we invest? Why have we let ourselves be this cheap for this long?

Why don’t we rouse a campaign to erase our shameful status of stiffing our teachers? Let’s see teachers, parents and students marching down the streets arm in arm, crying “Forty-Ninth! Forty-Ninth!” Let’s see candidates for governor and legislature vow, “We’re not shooting for the moon, just Mississippi!” Pegging a minimum wage for 9,200-some South Dakota teachers to Mississippi’s next-worst in the nation would take $22.4 million a year. It would take $42.1 million to beat Oklahoma. (Get out the Saturn V to reach Minnesota: we’d need $154.4 million, a 39 percent increase in Governor Dennis Daugaard’s proposed state aid to K-12 for FY2015.)

Money doesn’t grow on corn stalks. But South Dakota found a million dollars to hand to a floundering beef plant, even as the state faced a crushing $127-million deficit. This year the Governor is finding $30 million to pour into his economic development fund sooner than planned.

Where there’s a will, there’s a way. The debate over HCR 1002 shows that South Dakota lacks the will to even talk about being better than worst in paying teachers what they are worth.

Editor’s Note: Cory Heidelberger is our political columnist from the left. For a right-wing perspective on politics, please look for columns by Dr. Ken Blanchard on this site.

Cory Allen Heidelberger writes the Madville Times political blog. He grew up on the shores of Lake Herman. He studied math and history at SDSU and information systems at DSU, and has taught math, English, speech, and French at high schools East and West River.